Yannick
Technology is only part of the story. With major investments, you need to be able to demonstrate risks, compliance, and accountability. Three questions you must be able to answer.
With Azure Local, you have a shared model: the hardware sits in your own factory, the management layer runs via Azure. In practice, this means Azure Local often falls between the IT team and the cloud team. That requires clear agreements. Who is responsible when something goes wrong? Who decides on updates that affect production? Without those agreements, you end up in a gray area where neither team feels ownership.
Data stays local where required. That helps with data sovereignty and sector-specific regulations. Data on the local nodes is encrypted with BitLocker, both at rest and in transit. Azure provides logging and audit trails for the management layer. And with Azure Policy, you can enforce that configurations meet your own compliance requirements.
The responsibility for compliance remains with the organization. But the platform gives you the instruments to make it demonstrable and manageable.
Legacy infrastructure does not become more secure over time. Without centralized visibility, you miss problems until they escalate. Without modern management tools, you depend on local staff that is increasingly hard to find. And without a path toward innovation, you fall behind competitors that are investing.
Hardware ages. VMware licenses get more expensive. Local IT staff becomes scarcer. And you increasingly need to demonstrate that innovation and compliance go hand in hand.
The first step: map out which workloads are latency-critical and which are not. That determines what must run locally and what can move to the cloud. From there, you can design an architecture that combines both. Get in touch to discuss the options.
This article is part of the longread Factory of the Future.
Yannick de Koeijer
Gerelateerde blogs
